Kiribati vs Somalia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score

Kiribati
0.383
in 2023
Somalia
0.386
in 2023
Kiribati rank
149th
Somalia rank
146th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time

  • Kiribati
  • Somalia
00.10.20.30.4201520192023

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 0.386 against 0.383 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.003.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 149th and Somalia ranks 146th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Somalia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Somalia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.273 0.048 0.225 Kiribati
2020s 0.328 0.336 0.008 Somalia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Kiribati or Somalia?
Somalia, at 0.386 against 0.383 in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Kiribati and Somalia?
0.003, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Somalia?
7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Somalia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
Kiribati ranks 149th and Somalia ranks 146th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.