Italy vs North Macedonia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Italy
0.779
in 2023
North Macedonia
0.762
in 2023
Italy rank
19th
North Macedonia rank
21st
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Italy
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Italy currently reports 0.779 against 0.762 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.017.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 19th and North Macedonia ranks 21st of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.7332 | 0.6532 | 0.08 | Italy |
| 2020s | 0.725 | 0.7335 | 0.0085 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Italy or North Macedonia?
- Italy, at 0.779 against 0.762 in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Italy and North Macedonia?
- 0.017, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and North Macedonia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Italy and North Macedonia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Italy ranks 19th and North Macedonia ranks 21st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.