Iceland vs Zimbabwe: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Iceland
0.46
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.46
in 2023
Iceland rank
115th
Zimbabwe rank
115th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Iceland
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.46 against 0.46 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 180 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5272 | 0.3642 | 0.163 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.4515 | 0.4635 | 0.012 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Iceland or Zimbabwe?
- Iceland, at 0.46 against 0.46 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Iceland and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Zimbabwe rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Iceland ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.