Hong Kong (China) vs United Arab Emirates: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Hong Kong (China)
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 0.745 against 0.743 in Hong Kong (China), a difference of 0.002.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Hong Kong (China) ahead.
Hong Kong (China) ranks 26th and United Arab Emirates ranks 25th of 179 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong (China) averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong (China) | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.6178 | 0.319 | 0.2988 | Hong Kong (China) |
| 2020s | 0.705 | 0.737 | 0.032 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Hong Kong (China) or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 0.745 against 0.743 in Hong Kong (China) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Hong Kong (China) and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.002, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and United Arab Emirates?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong (China) and United Arab Emirates rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Hong Kong (China) ranks 26th and United Arab Emirates ranks 25th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.