Hong Kong (China) vs Ireland: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Hong Kong (China)
0.743
in 2023
Ireland
0.736
in 2023
Hong Kong (China) rank
26th
Ireland rank
27th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Hong Kong (China)
- Ireland
How they compare
Hong Kong (China) currently reports 0.743 against 0.736 in Ireland, a difference of 0.007.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Ireland ahead.
Hong Kong (China) ranks 26th and Ireland ranks 27th of 179 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong (China) averaged higher in 1 and Ireland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong (China) | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.6178 | 0.4865 | 0.1313 | Hong Kong (China) |
| 2020s | 0.705 | 0.7285 | 0.0235 | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Hong Kong (China) or Ireland?
- Hong Kong (China), at 0.743 against 0.736 in Ireland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Hong Kong (China) and Ireland?
- 0.007, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Ireland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong (China) and Ireland rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Hong Kong (China) ranks 26th and Ireland ranks 27th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.