Georgia vs Switzerland: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Georgia
0.645
in 2023
Switzerland
0.645
in 2023
Georgia rank
38th
Switzerland rank
38th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Georgia
- Switzerland
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.645 against 0.645 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 38th and Switzerland ranks 38th of 177 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.6987 | 0.7662 | 0.0675 | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 0.612 | 0.8225 | 0.2105 | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Georgia or Switzerland?
- Georgia, at 0.645 against 0.645 in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Georgia and Switzerland?
- 0, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Switzerland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Switzerland rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Georgia ranks 38th and Switzerland ranks 38th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.