Egypt vs Iran: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score

Egypt
0.4
in 2023
Iran
0.41
in 2023
Egypt rank
140th
Iran rank
138th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time

  • Egypt
  • Iran
00.20.40.60.8201520192023

How they compare

Iran currently reports 0.41 against 0.4 in Egypt, a difference of 0.01.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 140th and Iran ranks 138th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Iran in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Iran Difference Ahead
2010s 0.5228 0.5818 0.059 Iran
2020s 0.425 0.41 0.015 Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Egypt or Iran?
Iran, at 0.41 against 0.4 in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Egypt and Iran?
0.01, with Iran ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Iran?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Iran rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
Egypt ranks 140th and Iran ranks 138th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.