Djibouti vs Poland: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score

Djibouti
0.383
in 2023
Poland
0.926
in 2023
Djibouti rank
1st
Poland rank
3rd

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time

  • Djibouti
  • Poland
00.20.40.60.81201520192023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 0.926 against 0.383 in Djibouti, a difference of 0.543.

That makes Poland's figure about 2.4 times Djibouti's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Djibouti ranks 1st and Poland ranks 3rd of 1 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Poland Difference Ahead
2010s 0.2765 0.6915 0.415 Poland
2020s 0.358 0.819 0.461 Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Djibouti or Poland?
Poland, at 0.926 against 0.383 in Djibouti as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Djibouti and Poland?
0.543, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Poland?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Djibouti and Poland rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
Djibouti ranks 1st and Poland ranks 3rd of 1 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.