Congo vs Georgia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Congo
0.638
in 2023
Georgia
0.645
in 2023
Congo rank
41st
Georgia rank
38th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Congo
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.645 against 0.638 in Congo, a difference of 0.007.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Georgia ahead.
Congo ranks 41st and Georgia ranks 38th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5046 | 0.7278 | 0.2232 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.638 | 0.612 | 0.026 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Congo or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 0.645 against 0.638 in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Congo and Georgia?
- 0.007, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Georgia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Georgia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Congo ranks 41st and Georgia ranks 38th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.