China vs Ethiopia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
China
0.286
in 2023
Ethiopia
0.31
in 2023
China rank
169th
Ethiopia rank
166th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- China
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 0.31 against 0.286 in China, a difference of 0.024.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was China ahead.
China ranks 169th and Ethiopia ranks 166th of 177 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.6026 | 0.4178 | 0.1848 | China |
| 2020s | 0.294 | 0.286 | 0.008 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, China or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 0.31 against 0.286 in China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between China and Ethiopia?
- 0.024, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ethiopia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do China and Ethiopia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- China ranks 169th and Ethiopia ranks 166th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.