Burkina Faso vs Japan: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score

Burkina Faso
0.467
in 2023
Japan
0.467
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
103rd
Japan rank
103rd

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Japan
00.20.40.60.81201520192023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 0.467 against 0.467 in Japan, a difference of 0.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 103rd and Japan ranks 103rd of 177 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Japan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.4057 0.5907 0.185 Japan
2020s 0.45 0.492 0.042 Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Burkina Faso or Japan?
Burkina Faso, at 0.467 against 0.467 in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Burkina Faso and Japan?
0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Japan?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Japan rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
Burkina Faso ranks 103rd and Japan ranks 103rd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.