Brazil vs Congo: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Brazil
0.621
in 2023
Congo
0.638
in 2023
Brazil rank
44th
Congo rank
41st
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Brazil
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.638 against 0.621 in Brazil, a difference of 0.017.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 44th and Congo ranks 41st of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.572 | 0.5046 | 0.0674 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.613 | 0.638 | 0.025 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Brazil or Congo?
- Congo, at 0.638 against 0.621 in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Brazil and Congo?
- 0.017, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Congo?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Congo rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Brazil ranks 44th and Congo ranks 41st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.