Bolivia vs Malaysia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Bolivia
0.493
in 2023
Malaysia
0.49
in 2023
Bolivia rank
91st
Malaysia rank
92nd
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Bolivia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 0.493 against 0.49 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.003.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 91st and Malaysia ranks 92nd of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.348 | 0.381 | 0.033 | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 0.538 | 0.4785 | 0.0595 | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Bolivia or Malaysia?
- Bolivia, at 0.493 against 0.49 in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Bolivia and Malaysia?
- 0.003, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Malaysia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Bolivia and Malaysia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Bolivia ranks 91st and Malaysia ranks 92nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.