Belgium vs Sri Lanka: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score

Belgium
0.467
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.476
in 2023
Belgium rank
103rd
Sri Lanka rank
100th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time

  • Belgium
  • Sri Lanka
00.20.40.6201520192023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.476 against 0.467 in Belgium, a difference of 0.009.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 103rd and Sri Lanka ranks 100th of 177 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2010s 0.4637 0.5138 0.05 Sri Lanka
2020s 0.4 0.4595 0.0595 Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Belgium or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.476 against 0.467 in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Belgium and Sri Lanka?
0.009, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sri Lanka?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Sri Lanka rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
Belgium ranks 103rd and Sri Lanka ranks 100th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.