Belarus vs Croatia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score

Belarus
0.681
in 2023
Croatia
0.686
in 2023
Belarus rank
31st
Croatia rank
30th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time

  • Belarus
  • Croatia
00.20.40.60.8201520192023

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0.686 against 0.681 in Belarus, a difference of 0.005.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Croatia ahead.

Belarus ranks 31st and Croatia ranks 30th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Croatia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.592 0.5517 0.0403 Belarus
2020s 0.644 0.6645 0.0205 Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Belarus or Croatia?
Croatia, at 0.686 against 0.681 in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Belarus and Croatia?
0.005, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Croatia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Croatia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
Belarus ranks 31st and Croatia ranks 30th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.