Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Bangladesh
0.45
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.46
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
116th
Zimbabwe rank
113th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.46 against 0.45 in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 116th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 177 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5002 | 0.344 | 0.1562 | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 0.4905 | 0.4635 | 0.027 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Bangladesh or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.46 against 0.45 in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Bangladesh and Zimbabwe?
- 0.01, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Zimbabwe rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Bangladesh ranks 116th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.