Bangladesh vs Iceland: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Bangladesh
0.45
in 2023
Iceland
0.46
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
116th
Iceland rank
113th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.46 against 0.45 in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Iceland ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 116th and Iceland ranks 113th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5003 | 0.5272 | 0.027 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.4905 | 0.4515 | 0.039 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Bangladesh or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 0.46 against 0.45 in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Bangladesh and Iceland?
- 0.01, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Iceland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Iceland rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Bangladesh ranks 116th and Iceland ranks 113th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.