Bangladesh vs Cuba: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Bangladesh
0.45
in 2023
Cuba
0.45
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
116th
Cuba rank
116th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Cuba
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0.45 against 0.45 in Cuba, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Cuba ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 116th and Cuba ranks 116th of 177 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5002 | 0.6328 | 0.1326 | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.4905 | 0.675 | 0.1845 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Bangladesh or Cuba?
- Bangladesh, at 0.45 against 0.45 in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Bangladesh and Cuba?
- 0, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cuba?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Cuba rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Bangladesh ranks 116th and Cuba ranks 116th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.