Austria vs Georgia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score

Austria
0.657
in 2023
Georgia
0.645
in 2023
Austria rank
35th
Georgia rank
38th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time

  • Austria
  • Georgia
00.20.40.60.8201520192023

How they compare

Austria currently reports 0.657 against 0.645 in Georgia, a difference of 0.012.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 35th and Georgia ranks 38th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Georgia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.6837 0.6987 0.015 Georgia
2020s 0.725 0.612 0.113 Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Austria or Georgia?
Austria, at 0.657 against 0.645 in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Austria and Georgia?
0.012, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Georgia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Austria and Georgia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
Austria ranks 35th and Georgia ranks 38th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.