Australia vs Netherlands: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Australia
0.919
in 2023
Netherlands
0.917
in 2023
Australia rank
4th
Netherlands rank
5th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Australia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.919 against 0.917 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.002.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 4th and Netherlands ranks 5th of 177 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.951 | 0.9625 | 0.0115 | Netherlands |
| 2020s | 0.8605 | 0.925 | 0.0645 | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Australia or Netherlands?
- Australia, at 0.919 against 0.917 in Netherlands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Australia and Netherlands?
- 0.002, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Netherlands?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Netherlands rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Australia ranks 4th and Netherlands ranks 5th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.