Australia vs Denmark: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Australia
0.919
in 2023
Denmark
0.95
in 2023
Australia rank
4th
Denmark rank
2nd
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Australia
- Denmark
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0.95 against 0.919 in Australia, a difference of 0.031.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 4th and Denmark ranks 2nd of 177 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.951 | 0.9692 | 0.0182 | Denmark |
| 2020s | 0.8605 | 0.9585 | 0.098 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Australia or Denmark?
- Denmark, at 0.95 against 0.919 in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Australia and Denmark?
- 0.031, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Denmark?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Denmark rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Australia ranks 4th and Denmark ranks 2nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.