Afghanistan vs Macao: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score

Afghanistan
0.329
in 2023
Macao
0.352
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
159th
Macao rank
157th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Macao
0.20.30.40.5201520192023

How they compare

Macao currently reports 0.352 against 0.329 in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.023.

That makes Macao's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Macao ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 159th and Macao ranks 157th of 177 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Macao Difference Ahead
2010s 0.3063 0.4547 0.1483 Macao
2020s 0.3695 0.376 0.0065 Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Afghanistan or Macao?
Macao, at 0.352 against 0.329 in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Afghanistan and Macao?
0.023, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Macao?
7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Macao rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
Afghanistan ranks 159th and Macao ranks 157th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.