Hong Kong vs Latvia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Machine Readability Score
Hong Kong
0.967
in 2023
Latvia
0.967
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
13th
Latvia rank
13th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Machine Readability Score over time
- Hong Kong
- Latvia
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.967 against 0.967 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Latvia ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 13th and Latvia ranks 13th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.6735 | 0.902 | 0.2285 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.942 | 0.894 | 0.048 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - machine readability score, Hong Kong or Latvia?
- Hong Kong, at 0.967 against 0.967 in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - machine readability score between Hong Kong and Latvia?
- 0, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Latvia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong and Latvia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - machine readability score?
- Hong Kong ranks 13th and Latvia ranks 13th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Machine Readability Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether data are made available in machine readable formats. Machine readable file formats allow users to easily process data using a computer. Common machine readable formats include XLS, XLSX, CSV, and JSON files.