Hong Kong (China) vs Tunisia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Download Options Score
Hong Kong (China)
0.643
in 2023
Tunisia
0.638
in 2023
Hong Kong (China) rank
30th
Tunisia rank
31st
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Download Options Score over time
- Hong Kong (China)
- Tunisia
How they compare
Hong Kong (China) currently reports 0.643 against 0.638 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.005.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Tunisia ahead.
Hong Kong (China) ranks 30th and Tunisia ranks 31st of 179 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong (China) | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4337 | 0.44 | 0.0063 | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0.6025 | 0.614 | 0.0115 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - download options score, Hong Kong (China) or Tunisia?
- Hong Kong (China), at 0.643 against 0.638 in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - download options score between Hong Kong (China) and Tunisia?
- 0.005, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Tunisia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong (China) and Tunisia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - download options score?
- Hong Kong (China) ranks 30th and Tunisia ranks 31st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Download Options Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether download options are available. ODIN looks for three download options: (1) bulk download (at the indicator level), (2) API, and (3) user-select download (custom downloads). Options 2 and 3 are interchangeable for scoring purposes.