Hong Kong, China vs Serbia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Download Options Score
Hong Kong, China
0.643
in 2023
Serbia
0.638
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
30th
Serbia rank
31st
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Download Options Score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Serbia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.643 against 0.638 in Serbia, a difference of 0.005.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Serbia ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 30th and Serbia ranks 31st of 180 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4337 | 0.2963 | 0.1375 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 0.6025 | 0.6785 | 0.076 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - download options score, Hong Kong, China or Serbia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 0.643 against 0.638 in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - download options score between Hong Kong, China and Serbia?
- 0.005, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Serbia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Serbia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - download options score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 30th and Serbia ranks 31st of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Download Options Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether download options are available. ODIN looks for three download options: (1) bulk download (at the indicator level), (2) API, and (3) user-select download (custom downloads). Options 2 and 3 are interchangeable for scoring purposes.