Georgia vs Hong Kong (China): Dimension 2.2: Online access - Download Options Score
Georgia
0.638
in 2023
Hong Kong (China)
0.643
in 2023
Georgia rank
31st
Hong Kong (China) rank
30th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Download Options Score over time
- Georgia
- Hong Kong (China)
How they compare
Hong Kong (China) currently reports 0.643 against 0.638 in Georgia, a difference of 0.005.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 31st and Hong Kong (China) ranks 30th of 179 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Hong Kong (China) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.565 | 0.4337 | 0.1312 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.6415 | 0.6025 | 0.039 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - download options score, Georgia or Hong Kong (China)?
- Hong Kong (China), at 0.643 against 0.638 in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - download options score between Georgia and Hong Kong (China)?
- 0.005, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Hong Kong (China)?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Hong Kong (China) rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - download options score?
- Georgia ranks 31st and Hong Kong (China) ranks 30th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Download Options Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether download options are available. ODIN looks for three download options: (1) bulk download (at the indicator level), (2) API, and (3) user-select download (custom downloads). Options 2 and 3 are interchangeable for scoring purposes.