Jordan vs Saudi Arabia: Dimension 2.1: Data Releases

Jordan
1
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
1
in 2023
Jordan rank
1st
Saudi Arabia rank
1st

Dimension 2.1: Data Releases over time

  • Jordan
  • Saudi Arabia
00.20.40.60.81201620192023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 1 against 1 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 1st and Saudi Arabia ranks 1st of 214 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2010s 1 0.375 0.625 Jordan
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.1: data releases, Jordan or Saudi Arabia?
Jordan, at 1 against 1 in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.1: data releases between Jordan and Saudi Arabia?
0, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Saudi Arabia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Saudi Arabia rank globally for dimension 2.1: data releases?
Jordan ranks 1st and Saudi Arabia ranks 1st of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 2.1: Data Releases. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.1: Data Releases
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 2,149 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

SDDS/e-GDDS subscription. This indicator is based on whether the country subscribes to IMF SDDS+, SDDS, or e-GDDS standards. The source is the IMF Dissemination Standards Bulletin Board. This is a good data source but we recognize that it is a proxy for the concept we are seeking to capture rather than a direct measurement.