Equatorial Guinea vs San Marino: Dimension 2.1: Data Releases

Equatorial Guinea
0.5
in 2023
San Marino
0.5
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
79th
San Marino rank
79th

Dimension 2.1: Data Releases over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • San Marino
00.10.20.30.40.5201620192023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.5 against 0.5 in San Marino, a difference of 0.

Across all 8 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 79th and San Marino ranks 79th of 214 countries.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea San Marino Difference Ahead
2010s 0 0.375 0.375 San Marino
2020s 0.5 0.5 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.1: data releases, Equatorial Guinea or San Marino?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.5 against 0.5 in San Marino as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.1: data releases between Equatorial Guinea and San Marino?
0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and San Marino?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and San Marino rank globally for dimension 2.1: data releases?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 79th and San Marino ranks 79th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 2.1: Data Releases. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.1: Data Releases
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 2,149 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

SDDS/e-GDDS subscription. This indicator is based on whether the country subscribes to IMF SDDS+, SDDS, or e-GDDS standards. The source is the IMF Dissemination Standards Bulletin Board. This is a good data source but we recognize that it is a proxy for the concept we are seeking to capture rather than a direct measurement.