Bangladesh vs Equatorial Guinea: Dimension 2.1: Data Releases

Bangladesh
0.5
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.5
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
79th
Equatorial Guinea rank
79th

Dimension 2.1: Data Releases over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.10.20.30.40.5201620192023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0.5 against 0.5 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 79th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 79th of 214 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2010s 0.375 0 0.375 Bangladesh
2020s 0.5 0.5 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.1: data releases, Bangladesh or Equatorial Guinea?
Bangladesh, at 0.5 against 0.5 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.1: data releases between Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea?
0, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for dimension 2.1: data releases?
Bangladesh ranks 79th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 79th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 2.1: Data Releases. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.1: Data Releases
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 2,149 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

SDDS/e-GDDS subscription. This indicator is based on whether the country subscribes to IMF SDDS+, SDDS, or e-GDDS standards. The source is the IMF Dissemination Standards Bulletin Board. This is a good data source but we recognize that it is a proxy for the concept we are seeking to capture rather than a direct measurement.