Aruba vs Cote d'Ivoire: Dimension 2.1: Data Releases

Aruba
0.5
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire
0.5
in 2023
Aruba rank
79th
Cote d'Ivoire rank
79th

Dimension 2.1: Data Releases over time

  • Aruba
  • Cote d'Ivoire
00.10.20.30.40.5201620192023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.5 against 0.5 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Cote d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 79th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 79th of 214 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Cote d'Ivoire Difference Ahead
2010s 0.25 0.375 0.125 Cote d'Ivoire
2020s 0.5 0.5 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.1: data releases, Aruba or Cote d'Ivoire?
Aruba, at 0.5 against 0.5 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.1: data releases between Aruba and Cote d'Ivoire?
0, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Cote d'Ivoire?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for dimension 2.1: data releases?
Aruba ranks 79th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 79th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 2.1: Data Releases. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.1: Data Releases
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 2,149 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

SDDS/e-GDDS subscription. This indicator is based on whether the country subscribes to IMF SDDS+, SDDS, or e-GDDS standards. The source is the IMF Dissemination Standards Bulletin Board. This is a good data source but we recognize that it is a proxy for the concept we are seeking to capture rather than a direct measurement.