Antigua and Barbuda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Dimension 2.1: Data Releases
Antigua and Barbuda
0.5
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.5
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
79th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
79th
Dimension 2.1: Data Releases over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.5 against 0.5 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 79th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 79th of 217 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.375 | 0.375 | 0 | β |
| 2020s | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.1: data releases, Antigua and Barbuda or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.5 against 0.5 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.1: data releases between Antigua and Barbuda and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for dimension 2.1: data releases?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 79th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 79th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 2.1: Data Releases. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
SDDS/e-GDDS subscription. This indicator is based on whether the country subscribes to IMF SDDS+, SDDS, or e-GDDS standards. The source is the IMF Dissemination Standards Bulletin Board. This is a good data source but we recognize that it is a proxy for the concept we are seeking to capture rather than a direct measurement.