South Korea vs Moldova: Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations

South Korea
1
in 2023
Moldova
1
in 2023
South Korea rank
1st
Moldova rank
1st

Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations over time

  • South Korea
  • Moldova
0.20.40.60.81200420132023

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 1 against 1 in Moldova, a difference of 0.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.

South Korea ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 1st of 214 countries.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Moldova Difference Ahead
2000s 0.2667 0.4 0.1333 Moldova
2010s 0.78 0.78 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations, South Korea or Moldova?
South Korea, at 1 against 1 in Moldova as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations between South Korea and Moldova?
0, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Moldova?
20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do South Korea and Moldova rank globally for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations?
South Korea ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 1st of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 4,340 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Five measures usefulness or reliability of country produced measures for international organizations. First, on comparability of poverty estimates for the World Bank reporting on international poverty (Source: Povcalnet). Second on usable surveys for statistics on child mortality for the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (Source: https://childmortality.org/). Third on accuracy of debt reporting as classified by the World Bank (Source: World Bank WDI metadata). Fourth, on availability of safely managed drinking water data for use by JMP. Fifth, on labor force participation data for use by ILO. We recognize that these data sources provide only partial coverage but consider that they do at least provide some indication of the performance of the national statistical system. With more complete data sources it would be possible to assess this further