Laos vs Libya: Dietary composition by country
Laos
27.66 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Libya
29.21 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Laos rank
50th
Libya rank
49th
Dietary composition by country over time
- Laos
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 29.21 kilocalories per day per capita against 27.66 kilocalories per day per capita in Laos, a difference of 1.55 kilocalories per day per capita.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Laos's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 50th and Libya ranks 49th of 191 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.38 kilocalories per day per capita | 22.08 kilocalories per day per capita | 7.69 kilocalories per day per capita | Libya |
| 2020s | 20.43 kilocalories per day per capita | 27.37 kilocalories per day per capita | 6.94 kilocalories per day per capita | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dietary composition by country, Laos or Libya?
- Libya, at 29.21 kilocalories per day per capita against 27.66 kilocalories per day per capita in Laos as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dietary composition by country between Laos and Libya?
- 1.55 kilocalories per day per capita, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Libya?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Laos and Libya rank globally for dietary composition by country?
- Laos ranks 50th and Libya ranks 49th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Dietary composition by country. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.