Guatemala vs Sudan: Dietary composition by country
Guatemala
2.62 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Sudan
2.56 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2022
Guatemala rank
139th
Sudan rank
140th
Dietary composition by country over time
- Guatemala
- Sudan
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 2.62 kilocalories per day per capita against 2.56 kilocalories per day per capita in Sudan, a difference of 0.06 kilocalories per day per capita.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 139th and Sudan ranks 140th of 191 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.1 kilocalories per day per capita | 1.98 kilocalories per day per capita | 1.12 kilocalories per day per capita | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 3.24 kilocalories per day per capita | 2.39 kilocalories per day per capita | 0.847 kilocalories per day per capita | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dietary composition by country, Guatemala or Sudan?
- Guatemala, at 2.62 kilocalories per day per capita against 2.56 kilocalories per day per capita in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dietary composition by country between Guatemala and Sudan?
- 0.06 kilocalories per day per capita, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Guatemala and Sudan rank globally for dietary composition by country?
- Guatemala ranks 139th and Sudan ranks 140th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Dietary composition by country. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.