Croatia vs Tanzania: Dietary composition by country
Croatia
0 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2009
Tanzania
0.49 kilocalories per day per capita
in 2023
Croatia rank
178th
Tanzania rank
175th
Dietary composition by country over time
- Croatia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 0.49 kilocalories per day per capita against 0 kilocalories per day per capita in Croatia, a difference of 0.49 kilocalories per day per capita.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 178th and Tanzania ranks 175th of 191 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kilocalories per day per capita | 0 kilocalories per day per capita | 0 kilocalories per day per capita | — |
| 2000s | 0 kilocalories per day per capita | 0.0995 kilocalories per day per capita | 0.0995 kilocalories per day per capita | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dietary composition by country, Croatia or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 0.49 kilocalories per day per capita against 0 kilocalories per day per capita in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dietary composition by country between Croatia and Tanzania?
- 0.49 kilocalories per day per capita, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Tanzania?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2009.
- How do Croatia and Tanzania rank globally for dietary composition by country?
- Croatia ranks 178th and Tanzania ranks 175th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Dietary composition by country. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.