Chile vs Jamaica: The demographic transition in Sweden
Chile
14.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2008
Jamaica
16.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2009
Chile rank
22nd
Jamaica rank
20th
The demographic transition in Sweden over time
- Chile
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 16.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) against 14.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in Chile, a difference of 1.62 per 1,000 (in the entire population).
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 37 times across 129 shared years of data; in 1879 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 22nd and Jamaica ranks 20th of 56 countries.
Across the 14 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 6 and Jamaica in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 40.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Chile |
| 1880s | 35.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Jamaica |
| 1890s | 37.91 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Jamaica |
| 1900s | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.65 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 0.15 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Jamaica |
| 1910s | 39.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36.78 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 2.25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Chile |
| 1920s | 41.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36.81 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 4.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Chile |
| 1930s | 33.92 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.47 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 0.45 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Chile |
| 1940s | 34.09 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 2.56 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Chile |
| 1950s | 34.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 0.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Chile |
| 1960s | 32.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 6.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Jamaica |
| 1970s | 24.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.92 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 6.21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 22.65 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 2.35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 19.48 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 3.86 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 14.86 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.84 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 2.98 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher the demographic transition in sweden, Chile or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 16.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) against 14.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in Chile as of 2009.
- What is the difference in the demographic transition in sweden between Chile and Jamaica?
- 1.62 per 1,000 (in the entire population), with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Jamaica?
- 129 years are reported by both, from 1879 to 2008.
- How do Chile and Jamaica rank globally for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Chile ranks 22nd and Jamaica ranks 20th of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mitchell (2013) β processed by Our World in Data, published as The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.