Lithuania vs Marshall Islands: Democratic Electoral Institutions Score

Lithuania
12
in 2025
Marshall Islands
12
in 2025
Lithuania rank
1st
Marshall Islands rank
1st

Democratic Electoral Institutions Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • Marshall Islands
02.557.51012.5200520152025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 12 against 12 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.

Lithuania ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 12 11.6 0.4 Lithuania
2010s 12 11.5 0.5 Lithuania
2020s 12 12 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democratic electoral institutions score, Lithuania or Marshall Islands?
Lithuania, at 12 against 12 in Marshall Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in democratic electoral institutions score between Lithuania and Marshall Islands?
0, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Marshall Islands?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and Marshall Islands rank globally for democratic electoral institutions score?
Lithuania ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Freedom House (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democratic Electoral Institutions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democratic Electoral Institutions Score
Source
Freedom House (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
197 places, 4,121 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The variable identifies the extent to which the chief executive and legislature are chosen in free and fair elections under universal suffrage. Higher scores indicate a freer electoral process.