Ecuador vs Liechtenstein: Democratic Electoral Institutions Score

Ecuador
10
in 2025
Liechtenstein
10
in 2025
Ecuador rank
78th
Liechtenstein rank
78th

Democratic Electoral Institutions Score over time

  • Ecuador
  • Liechtenstein
02.557.51012.5200520152025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 10 against 10 in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Liechtenstein ahead.

Ecuador ranks 78th and Liechtenstein ranks 78th of 197 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Liechtenstein in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
2000s 8.8 12 3.2 Liechtenstein
2010s 7.4 11.2 3.8 Liechtenstein
2020s 10.33 10 0.3333 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democratic electoral institutions score, Ecuador or Liechtenstein?
Ecuador, at 10 against 10 in Liechtenstein as of 2025.
What is the difference in democratic electoral institutions score between Ecuador and Liechtenstein?
0, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Liechtenstein?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Liechtenstein rank globally for democratic electoral institutions score?
Ecuador ranks 78th and Liechtenstein ranks 78th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Freedom House (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democratic Electoral Institutions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democratic Electoral Institutions Score
Source
Freedom House (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
197 places, 4,121 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The variable identifies the extent to which the chief executive and legislature are chosen in free and fair elections under universal suffrage. Higher scores indicate a freer electoral process.