Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Democratic Electoral Institutions Score

Belarus
0
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
0
in 2025
Belarus rank
163rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
163rd

Democratic Electoral Institutions Score over time

  • Belarus
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.20.40.60.81200520152025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 against 0 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 163rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd of 197 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 0.2 0 0.2 Belarus
2010s 0 0 0
2020s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democratic electoral institutions score, Belarus or Equatorial Guinea?
Belarus, at 0 against 0 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in democratic electoral institutions score between Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?
0, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for democratic electoral institutions score?
Belarus ranks 163rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Freedom House (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democratic Electoral Institutions Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democratic Electoral Institutions Score
Source
Freedom House (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
197 places, 4,121 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The variable identifies the extent to which the chief executive and legislature are chosen in free and fair elections under universal suffrage. Higher scores indicate a freer electoral process.