Tunisia vs Ukraine: Deliberative Political Institutions Index

Tunisia
0.753
in 2025
Ukraine
0.75
in 2025
Tunisia rank
62nd
Ukraine rank
63rd

Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time

  • Tunisia
  • Ukraine
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.753 against 0.75 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.003.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Tunisia ahead.

Tunisia ranks 62nd and Ukraine ranks 63rd of 175 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 7 and Ukraine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia Ukraine Difference Ahead
1940s 0.222 0.072 0.15 Tunisia
1950s 0.3544 0.222 0.1324 Tunisia
1960s 0.544 0.3092 0.2348 Tunisia
1970s 0.5582 0.261 0.2972 Tunisia
1980s 0.5432 0.4229 0.1203 Tunisia
1990s 0.4575 0.555 0.0975 Ukraine
2000s 0.3984 0.6711 0.2727 Ukraine
2010s 0.8646 0.6892 0.1754 Tunisia
2020s 0.8007 0.7615 0.0392 Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Tunisia or Ukraine?
Tunisia, at 0.753 against 0.75 in Ukraine as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Tunisia and Ukraine?
0.003, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Ukraine?
80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
How do Tunisia and Ukraine rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
Tunisia ranks 62nd and Ukraine ranks 63rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.