Peru vs Qatar: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Peru
0.475
in 2025
Qatar
0.473
in 2025
Peru rank
117th
Qatar rank
118th
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Peru
- Qatar
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.475 against 0.473 in Qatar, a difference of 0.002.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 117th and Qatar ranks 118th of 175 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.3059 | 0.027 | 0.2789 | Peru |
| 1910s | 0.2156 | 0.0408 | 0.1748 | Peru |
| 1920s | 0.165 | 0.096 | 0.069 | Peru |
| 1930s | 0.1803 | 0.096 | 0.0843 | Peru |
| 1940s | 0.1624 | 0.1059 | 0.0565 | Peru |
| 1950s | 0.2079 | 0.115 | 0.0929 | Peru |
| 1960s | 0.354 | 0.13 | 0.224 | Peru |
| 1970s | 0.1972 | 0.1003 | 0.0969 | Peru |
| 1980s | 0.7102 | 0.1026 | 0.6076 | Peru |
| 1990s | 0.4362 | 0.1381 | 0.2981 | Peru |
| 2000s | 0.8348 | 0.2926 | 0.5422 | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.7603 | 0.3412 | 0.4191 | Peru |
| 2020s | 0.5677 | 0.4077 | 0.16 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Peru or Qatar?
- Peru, at 0.475 against 0.473 in Qatar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Peru and Qatar?
- 0.002, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Qatar?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Peru and Qatar rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Peru ranks 117th and Qatar ranks 118th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.