Panama vs Ukraine: Deliberative Political Institutions Index

Panama
0.755
in 2025
Ukraine
0.75
in 2025
Panama rank
61st
Ukraine rank
63rd

Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time

  • Panama
  • Ukraine
00.20.40.60.8190319642025

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.755 against 0.75 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.005.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 61st and Ukraine ranks 63rd of 175 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 7 and Ukraine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Ukraine Difference Ahead
1940s 0.353 0.072 0.281 Panama
1950s 0.3283 0.222 0.1063 Panama
1960s 0.3545 0.3092 0.0453 Panama
1970s 0.4161 0.261 0.1551 Panama
1980s 0.1552 0.4229 0.2677 Ukraine
1990s 0.8104 0.555 0.2554 Panama
2000s 0.8748 0.6711 0.2037 Panama
2010s 0.8467 0.6892 0.1575 Panama
2020s 0.761 0.7615 0.0005 Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Panama or Ukraine?
Panama, at 0.755 against 0.75 in Ukraine as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Panama and Ukraine?
0.005, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Ukraine?
80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
How do Panama and Ukraine rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
Panama ranks 61st and Ukraine ranks 63rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.