Niger vs Suriname: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Niger
0.771
in 2025
Suriname
0.777
in 2025
Niger rank
58th
Suriname rank
56th
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Niger
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0.777 against 0.771 in Niger, a difference of 0.006.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Suriname ahead.
Niger ranks 58th and Suriname ranks 56th of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.103 | 0.334 | 0.231 | Suriname |
| 1930s | 0.103 | 0.3574 | 0.2544 | Suriname |
| 1940s | 0.103 | 0.4206 | 0.3176 | Suriname |
| 1950s | 0.0982 | 0.6881 | 0.5899 | Suriname |
| 1960s | 0.151 | 0.72 | 0.569 | Suriname |
| 1970s | 0.1451 | 0.7245 | 0.5794 | Suriname |
| 1980s | 0.1633 | 0.3118 | 0.1485 | Suriname |
| 1990s | 0.6369 | 0.7824 | 0.1455 | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0.7836 | 0.788 | 0.0044 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.9035 | 0.787 | 0.1165 | Niger |
| 2020s | 0.8457 | 0.7643 | 0.0813 | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Niger or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0.777 against 0.771 in Niger as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Niger and Suriname?
- 0.006, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Suriname?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Niger and Suriname rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Niger ranks 58th and Suriname ranks 56th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.