Niger vs Panama: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Niger
0.771
in 2025
Panama
0.755
in 2025
Niger rank
58th
Panama rank
61st
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Niger
- Panama
How they compare
Niger currently reports 0.771 against 0.755 in Panama, a difference of 0.016.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Panama ahead.
Niger ranks 58th and Panama ranks 61st of 175 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.103 | 0.252 | 0.149 | Panama |
| 1930s | 0.103 | 0.2461 | 0.1431 | Panama |
| 1940s | 0.103 | 0.2964 | 0.1934 | Panama |
| 1950s | 0.0982 | 0.3283 | 0.2301 | Panama |
| 1960s | 0.151 | 0.3545 | 0.2035 | Panama |
| 1970s | 0.1451 | 0.4161 | 0.271 | Panama |
| 1980s | 0.1633 | 0.1552 | 0.0081 | Niger |
| 1990s | 0.6369 | 0.8104 | 0.1735 | Panama |
| 2000s | 0.7836 | 0.8748 | 0.0912 | Panama |
| 2010s | 0.9035 | 0.8467 | 0.0568 | Niger |
| 2020s | 0.8457 | 0.761 | 0.0847 | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Niger or Panama?
- Niger, at 0.771 against 0.755 in Panama as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Niger and Panama?
- 0.016, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Panama?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Niger and Panama rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Niger ranks 58th and Panama ranks 61st of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.