Myanmar vs Yemen, Rep.: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Myanmar
0.118
in 2025
Yemen, Rep.
0.111
in 2025
Myanmar rank
163rd
Yemen, Rep. rank
164th
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Myanmar
- Yemen, Rep.
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 0.118 against 0.111 in Yemen, Rep., a difference of 0.007.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Yemen, Rep.'s.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 163rd and Yemen, Rep. ranks 164th of 175 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 4 and Yemen, Rep. in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Yemen, Rep. | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.27 | 0.0362 | 0.2338 | Myanmar |
| 1910s | 0.27 | 0.0984 | 0.1716 | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 0.068 | 0.4849 | 0.4169 | Yemen, Rep. |
| 2000s | 0.074 | 0.4231 | 0.3491 | Yemen, Rep. |
| 2010s | 0.5994 | 0.3147 | 0.2847 | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 0.2328 | 0.1118 | 0.121 | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Myanmar or Yemen, Rep.?
- Myanmar, at 0.118 against 0.111 in Yemen, Rep. as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Myanmar and Yemen, Rep.?
- 0.007, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Yemen, Rep.?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Myanmar and Yemen, Rep. rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Myanmar ranks 163rd and Yemen, Rep. ranks 164th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.