Malta vs Montenegro: Deliberative Political Institutions Index

Malta
0.811
in 2025
Montenegro
0.813
in 2025
Malta rank
47th
Montenegro rank
44th

Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time

  • Malta
  • Montenegro
00.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 0.813 against 0.811 in Malta, a difference of 0.002.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 47th and Montenegro ranks 44th of 175 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Montenegro Difference Ahead
1900s 0.629 0.1756 0.4534 Malta
1910s 0.629 0.171 0.458 Malta
1990s 0.841 0.67 0.171 Malta
2000s 0.841 0.7271 0.1139 Malta
2010s 0.8169 0.7668 0.0501 Malta
2020s 0.8077 0.7963 0.0113 Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Malta or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 0.813 against 0.811 in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Malta and Montenegro?
0.002, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Montenegro?
46 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Malta and Montenegro rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
Malta ranks 47th and Montenegro ranks 44th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.