Mali vs Togo: Deliberative Political Institutions Index

Mali
0.697
in 2025
Togo
0.706
in 2025
Mali rank
78th
Togo rank
75th

Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time

  • Mali
  • Togo
00.20.40.60.8190019622025

How they compare

Togo currently reports 0.706 against 0.697 in Mali, a difference of 0.009.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Mali ahead.

Mali ranks 78th and Togo ranks 75th of 175 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 9 and Togo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Togo Difference Ahead
1910s 0.054 0.052 0.002 Mali
1920s 0.054 0.052 0.002 Mali
1930s 0.054 0.052 0.002 Mali
1940s 0.0876 0.1456 0.058 Togo
1950s 0.138 0.2626 0.1246 Togo
1960s 0.4642 0.2151 0.2491 Mali
1970s 0.126 0.087 0.039 Mali
1980s 0.192 0.087 0.105 Mali
1990s 0.7674 0.4722 0.2952 Mali
2000s 0.8144 0.6296 0.1848 Mali
2010s 0.7995 0.7504 0.0491 Mali
2020s 0.7228 0.7372 0.0143 Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Mali or Togo?
Togo, at 0.706 against 0.697 in Mali as of 2025.
What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Mali and Togo?
0.009, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Togo?
110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
How do Mali and Togo rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
Mali ranks 78th and Togo ranks 75th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.