Libya vs Taiwan: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Libya
0.84
in 2025
Taiwan
0.859
in 2025
Libya rank
35th
Taiwan rank
32nd
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Libya
- Taiwan
How they compare
Taiwan currently reports 0.859 against 0.84 in Libya, a difference of 0.019.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Taiwan ahead.
Libya ranks 35th and Taiwan ranks 32nd of 175 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Taiwan in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Taiwan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0.014 | 0.1222 | 0.1082 | Taiwan |
| 1940s | 0.014 | 0.078 | 0.064 | Taiwan |
| 1950s | 0.155 | 0.1447 | 0.0103 | Libya |
| 1960s | 0.1552 | 0.1633 | 0.0081 | Taiwan |
| 1970s | 0.081 | 0.2453 | 0.1643 | Taiwan |
| 1980s | 0.081 | 0.4547 | 0.3737 | Taiwan |
| 1990s | 0.123 | 0.8029 | 0.6799 | Taiwan |
| 2000s | 0.148 | 0.901 | 0.753 | Taiwan |
| 2010s | 0.605 | 0.852 | 0.247 | Taiwan |
| 2020s | 0.7207 | 0.8953 | 0.1747 | Taiwan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Libya or Taiwan?
- Taiwan, at 0.859 against 0.84 in Libya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Libya and Taiwan?
- 0.019, with Taiwan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Taiwan?
- 83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Taiwan rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Libya ranks 35th and Taiwan ranks 32nd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.