Libya vs Malawi: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Libya
0.84
in 2025
Malawi
0.836
in 2025
Libya rank
35th
Malawi rank
38th
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Libya
- Malawi
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.84 against 0.836 in Malawi, a difference of 0.004.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 83 shared years of data; in 1934 it was Malawi ahead.
Libya ranks 35th and Malawi ranks 38th of 175 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0.014 | 0.046 | 0.032 | Malawi |
| 1940s | 0.014 | 0.046 | 0.032 | Malawi |
| 1950s | 0.155 | 0.0536 | 0.1014 | Libya |
| 1960s | 0.1552 | 0.1736 | 0.0184 | Malawi |
| 1970s | 0.081 | 0.1178 | 0.0368 | Malawi |
| 1980s | 0.081 | 0.115 | 0.034 | Malawi |
| 1990s | 0.123 | 0.5314 | 0.4084 | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0.148 | 0.7382 | 0.5902 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.605 | 0.7421 | 0.1371 | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0.7207 | 0.8047 | 0.084 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Libya or Malawi?
- Libya, at 0.84 against 0.836 in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Libya and Malawi?
- 0.004, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Malawi?
- 83 years are reported by both, from 1934 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Malawi rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Libya ranks 35th and Malawi ranks 38th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.