Hong Kong, China vs Palestine, State of: Deliberative Political Institutions Index
Hong Kong, China
0.164
in 2025
Palestine, State of
0.173
in 1948
Hong Kong, China rank
158th
Palestine, State of rank
156th
Deliberative Political Institutions Index over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 0.173 against 0.164 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.009.
That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 158th and Palestine, State of ranks 156th of 175 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.219 | 0.173 | 0.046 | Hong Kong, China |
| 1920s | 0.227 | 0.173 | 0.054 | Hong Kong, China |
| 1930s | 0.227 | 0.173 | 0.054 | Hong Kong, China |
| 1940s | 0.1891 | 0.173 | 0.0161 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deliberative political institutions index, Hong Kong, China or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 0.173 against 0.164 in Hong Kong, China as of 1948.
- What is the difference in deliberative political institutions index between Hong Kong, China and Palestine, State of?
- 0.009, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Palestine, State of?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 1948.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Palestine, State of rank globally for deliberative political institutions index?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 158th and Palestine, State of ranks 156th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deliberative Political Institutions Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their positions, justify them with the common good, acknowledge counterarguments, consult elites in policy changes, and society deliberates policy changes.